The difference
between innovation and R&D is a principal matter to consider. A lot of
companies nowadays confuse innovation with research and development.
Research and
development, commonly known as R&D, encompasses every activity that
businesses take on to innovate and instigate new products and services. It is
commonly the first step in the entire development process, done with the intent
to establish new offerings under the company’s sleeve.
In essence, the
absence of a research and development program may cause a business to
eventually fail and fall out of the competition. Its survival may have to
depend on other methods to develop, like partnerships, mergers, and
acquisitions. As R&D contributes to the development of knowledge and
technology, companies invest in it to obtain useful data that can help in
surging revenue growth.
People have the
tendency to confuse innovation with the conception of an entirely new
technology or product. But the truth is that innovations are actually present
in other areas too.
Innovation is
found in every field. It is the process of realizing new products, processes,
propositions, or business models to create added value for customers and/or
employees.Note that a major fragment of this definition that needs emphasis is
the fact that in order for innovation to happen, the new idea must add value
for other parties aside from the business itself.This part basically reiterates
the significance of taking into consideration the end-users from the beginning
of the innovation process. Including them in the equation guarantees
satisfaction on their part, which in turn increases the idea’s chances of success.
For companies,
innovation must produce added value.Proper execution of the innovation process
can yield an enormous amount of value to the business. In addition, the kind of
innovation implemented determines the length of time where the process can
provide a return on investment.
Businesses can
encourage innovation in the following ways:
2.
Setting up innovation challenges
3.
Obtaining customer feedback
4.
Investing in resources that contribute to
speeding up the process
5.
Innovation also takes future risks into
consideration when formulating ways to change and discover opportunities. It
keeps organizations relevant and profitable.
Technically,
innovation is larger than research and development as it includes three
definite parts — discovery, incubation, and acceleration. Predominantly,
R&D is only a fragment of the first stage.
Brands have to
learn from previously existing companies that failed to make a change to thrive
in the competition. Investing a huge amount of cash with little commercial
payoff won’t do. Innovation has to be done.Unfortunately, most companies that
focus on product leadership, operational excellence, and even customer intimacy
concentrate on R&D too much, even when R&D is in fact, only a fraction
of innovation’s first stage.
Additionally,
R&D is not only costly but a lot riskier. With R&D, businesses are
exposed to errors, inaccuracies, and a lesser chance of success that come along
while developing something new and groundbreaking.This leaves investments to
waste — scaling things only to discover that little to no customers are willing
to purchase them.
This is a risk
that cannot be ignored if a return on investment must be secured. New
technological areas must be studied, and efforts must be conducted to penetrate
both new and existing markets.
Definitions of
the two are almost similar, so the confusion still stands today. Moreover, the
boundaries of where the one starts and where the other ends are often not
emphasized in articles.
Firms create
new products and services and present them as the ultimate solution that meets
the needs of their potential customers. Businesses have their best foot forward
in enhancing commercial performance by applying innovation to their existing
offers. This reiterates the need for brands to focus on innovative activities
to effectively appeal to the market.
But the
confusion between R&D and innovation happens as there is actually a direct
link between the two…
With all the
risks it entails, concentrating on R&D spending might not be the best thing
to do. Such a practice does not measure how innovative a business is.
Fundamentally, having a systematic R&D process is great, but it does not
equate to market success.
To reiterate
this point, The Global Innovation 1000 report has written the world’s top 1000
most innovative companies for more than a decade and has statistically shown
the absence of a remarkable relationship between R&D spending and sustained
financial performance.
Interestingly,
its findings entail overall R&D spending and percentage of revenues. This
study has outlined that R&D spending does not correlate to profit growth,
nor is it linked to a surge in market capitalization and shareholder returns.
To understand
this further, R&D labs have regularly just focused on working out a firm’s
ability to develop new technologies. Innovation solves both this and the risk
of whether the market will even purchase and utilize the product despite its
features and usability. Focusing on the first may increase a company’s number
of patentable products, and it does warrant the success of those products and
services in the market. To ensure that both of these things happen, companies
have to establish innovation plans and methodologies for sustainable business
models. Innovation also needs businesses to arrive at a thorough perception of
customer needs to conceive products that the market would want.
Their efforts
have to result in delivering customer value that’s both maintainable and
revenue-generating. In the end, a successful innovation process has nothing to
do with the amount of money that you invest in research and development.
However, this doesn’t mean letting R&D labs die out of the lack of
resources and funding. Speaking of R&D and innovation, you are likely
looking at idea management. If you want to learn more, we got an ultimate guide
to idea management that you can download for free. Check out and dive deeper
into idea management.
No comments:
Post a Comment